自我對話之憤怒文章  - 慎入/看



或者, 連續拼命做幾個禮拜, 記性差咗, 脾氣衰咗

呢一刻, 我真係要吊人

你做乜能嘢又咁樣send d email出黎, 乜你分唔清楚咩係blog咩係media咩

我其實都真係分唔清喎, 因為我唔拿想做screen cap, 已經做到仆晒街

不如你就算吧啦

你突然緊張, 我就十級憤怒, 我諗你同我一樣快m到, 妖!

心入面既分野越黎越大

策唔策展, 其實個核心係你想表達d咩, 唔想表現出d 咩

(that is somehow = the core value of curatorship - i believe)

人地係低手

但問題係, 個design真係表現出一個可以讓人咁樣解讀既design, 咁有咩計

and then, 你唔可以話自己冇curatorship就冇落註腳囉

你唔想人地解讀成點, 其實都係有跡可尋

我地文化研究寶寶批評既論點, 係唔會只係睇curatorial statement囉

that is what you re-present, everything has an interpretation

呢點上我做唔到自欺欺人

以組織架構去review事件係慣常做法, 就好似人地話漁護署只係一個署, 權力好細, 但就身兼前線保育同動植物生死尤關; 每個部門都有佢特點同target, mkt team做展覽當然係畀人插啦, 雖然我地都已經好小心, 好decent咁, 但有冇取捨, 標準如何, 我地心知肚明

thats why ppl always ask whether u have a art department to handle all these stuff

但話需說回頭

even if there is an art dept, in essence, 都係要為公司服務囉

(部分)世界悲哀!!       (括咗, 唔好話我radical!! FUCK!!!)

精神錯亂!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GIVE ME FIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

我諗個低手記者做法係欠咗一個公道, that is he doesn't ask if there is any staff in this mkt team has art (or cultural studies/ sociology/ history) background囉; and even without a crew member like this, 有咩問題; he needs to explain!

ok, 火退返

我明白你好緊張, 洗咗咁拿多錢, 要交代, 否則條team會被失踪, 哈!!!!

ok

words to myself

我知, 錯就要認, 打要企定

你聽日好快d去解決件事, 否則你又會無限投射同延伸, 到時搞唔掂又要見輔導, 洗晒d 錢!!!

what a fucking nite!

stop writing me emails!!! i hate reading your sudden emails!!!!